Hello, You can call "addEntry()" multiple times for the same entry (for example if you discover more content belonging for this entry on the next lines), but as soon as you call "addEntry()" for another entry, you shall not call it for the previous one. This is because when using AutoRefresh with fi...

Hello, Yes, I understand. I feel like it's a tricky situation, I'm not sure what's the best approach, because when I use spreadsheets like Excel or Google Sheets, I'm never really satisfied, especially when there are big (tall) cells, scrolling is painful because it will scroll giant by cell at a ti...

Hello,

Thanks for submitting your idea, it looks indeed really nice with the new dark theme:


We'll add the option soon, I'll post a message in this thread to let you know when it's available!

Thanks,
Xavier

Well actually, I just realized: what about having the same font for both the log entries table AND the log entry details panel at the bottom? Because if you need a monospaced font for the table, you may also want to have the same this when looking at the entry details. What do you think?

Hello, Thanks for submitting your idea. It's a pretty good idea to use a monospaced font in this case for the table only (and not for the whole UI because that would indeed look weird!). But I have one question though: how about the font size? Would you be able to pick a specific font size for the t...

Hello, Thanks for submitting your idea. Funny enough, LogMX have not had this feature for many years (we, too, didn't see the need to sort logs), and due to the high demand, we finally implemented it when we realized (while talking with users) that most of the time, people need to actually GROUP log...

Hello,

Sorry for the late fix, LogMX v7.6.0 has just been released and includes a fix for this bug.
(in case you're wondering, version 7.5.0 was a quick hotfix for another issue, and could not include a fix for this encoding issue because of time constraints).

Xavier

Hello, I'm not sure which issue you are talking about. From what I know, there's no issues concerning these tabs. If you're talking about the text in the tabs being shortened (it's not a bug, it's a feature!) then it will happen when your tabs don't fit anymore in the window, so it depends on the si...

Hello, Sorry to hear that. I just tested on Ubuntu 18.04 with AdoptOpenJDK 11.0.1, and it works fine on my side. We haven't made any recent changes concerning the UI framework that could explain such a regression. I would suggest trying with another Java VM (AdoptOpenJDK is not the most common): htt...

Hello, It should work (I just tested it), there's no known bug related to what you describe. Could you please post here a few lines of your logs and your Regex? On my side, here is my test log file: ERROR 3 msg 3 INFO 1 msg 1 DEBUG msg empty INFO 1 msg 1 DEBUG msg empty INFO 2 msg 2 And my regex + r...

Hello, I agree that it would be easy for LogMX to store your Client ID, but not storing it is actually by design (sadly for the users): the purpose is to make things a bit more complicated to have illegal copies of LogMX being updated - so that at least honest people don't do it without knowing it.....

Hello,

You are right, this is indeed a bug.
Sorry about that. It will be fixed in the version following v7.4.0 (7.4.0 is already in the pipe to be released in a few hours).
I will post a message in this thread to let you know.

Xavier

Hello, I agree that a private key file shouldn't be used without a passphrase. I just tried on macOS 10.13.3 with LogMX v7.3.0, and it worked fine with a passphrase-protected PK file generated with "openssl genrsa -des3 -out my.key 2048". So I'm not sure what is going on, could you please let me kno...

Hello Paolo, How did you generate your private key file? Which key size did you use? I just tried with Ubuntu 18 ("ssh-keygen" in command line, with the default key size of 2048), LogMX was able to connect using the passphrase-protected private key. Also: if you have entered a passphrase in LogMX op...

Hello, From the details you provided, I don't understand understand why you cannot connect, but here are a few things to try/consider: Please avoid using the SCP protocol, and try SFTP instead. Usually servers that handle SCP also support SFTP, which provides way more features and is more reliable (...